Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(3): 804-811, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Doctors can influence the development of sound healthcare policy through financial contributions to political campaigns and candidates. Our objective was to characterize the political contributions of otolaryngologists in the United States, both individually and through the ENT Political Action Committee (ENTPAC) between the years 2003 and 2020. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Publicly available information on the internet: fec.gov. METHODS: The Federal Election Commission's website, fec.gov, was used to identify the political contributions of individual otolaryngologists and the ENTPAC between 2003 and 2020. Each contribution is associated with a political group or candidate, designated as a Republican, Democratic, or Independent entity. RESULTS: A total of 1407 distinct political contributions were made by individuals identifying as otolaryngologists between 2003 and 2020, totaling $432,201. Overall, Republicans received more individual donations than Democrats (711 vs 540), while Democrats received more money ($231,139 vs $183,427). Donations peaked during election years, with the total amount overall increasing each election year ($9664 in 2004 vs $75,102 in 2020). The predominant political party receiving donations between 2003 and 2020 in each US state matched each state's predominant party of the governors and senators 48.6% of the time. The ENTPAC donated $3,027,383 between 2003 and 2020 to a variety of political candidates and entities. CONCLUSION: Otolaryngologists are making increased political contributions over time and interest in political advocacy may be at an all-time high. Increased time and attention should be devoted to educating otolaryngologists to best politically advocate for interests which are of the most importance to themselves and the profession.


Assuntos
Otorrinolaringologistas , Médicos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Política , Doações , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37801633

RESUMO

Elbow fractures in the pediatric population are an exceedingly common injury, comprising 5% to 10% of all pediatric fractures, with supracondylar fractures being the most common of the subset. Radial neck fractures are less frequent, comprising only 1% of all pediatric fractures. We provide a case report of a 7-year-old girl with a left radial neck and proximal ulna fracture. A 7-year-old girl presented to the emergency department after falling off a rock wall the day before. Imaging showed a left proximal ulna and proximal radial neck fracture. The patient underwent percutaneous reduction and fixation, complicated by subsequent infection requiring surgical débridement. The patient then developed a recurrent infection 1 year later, requiring repeat irrigation and débridement. The patient has since made a full recovery, returned to activities of daily living, and regained a full range of motion. Radial neck fractures have a low incidence and have been frequently associated with poor outcomes. The main mechanism by which these fractures occur is due to falling on an outstretched arm. Percutaneous pinning is often recommended after unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction because open reduction is often complicated by postoperative stiffness. As with any procedure that involves breaking the skin, there is a risk of infection. However, there is unclear evidence regarding ideal perioperative management to prevent postoperative infection.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Rádio , Fraturas da Ulna , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Rádio (Anatomia)/lesões , Rádio (Anatomia)/cirurgia , Reinfecção/complicações , Atividades Cotidianas , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Fraturas do Rádio/complicações , Fraturas da Ulna/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Ulna/cirurgia , Fraturas da Ulna/complicações
3.
J Voice ; 2023 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36948907

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Prospective laryngology fellows have limited opportunities to learn about fellowship programs besides personal conversations with program directors and mentors. Online information about fellowships may optimize the laryngology match process. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of online information about laryngology fellowship programs through analysis of program websites and surveying current and recent laryngology fellows. METHODS: The websites of 20 laryngology fellowship programs were analyzed for the presence of 18 unique criteria, previously described in the literature. A survey was distributed to current and recent fellows to determine helpful resources and improvements of fellowship websites. RESULTS: On average, program websites fulfilled 33% of the 18 criteria used for analysis. The criteria most often fulfilled were "program description," "case descriptions," and "fellowship director contact information." Of respondents from our survey, 47% strongly disagreed that fellowship websites helped them identify desirable programs, and 57% somewhat or strongly agreed that more detailed websites would have made identification of desirable programs easier. Fellows were most interested in finding information about program descriptions, contact information for program directors and coordinators, and current laryngology fellows. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, laryngology fellowship program websites can improve, making the application process easier. As programs incorporate more information regarding contact information, current fellows, interviews, and case volume/descriptions on their websites, they will allow applicants to make more informed decisions and find the programs that fit them the best.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA